Recreating Foreign Keys with Alembic

| programming | python | databases |

Alembic is a great tool for keeping track of schema changes in python applications. I am using it to manage DB migrations for braindump along with Flask SQL Alchemy as my ORM. One challenge is managing proper foreign key constraints. By default if you define a foreign key relationship in your schema definition it will not generate the proper migration code. For example, in braindump we have a one to many relationship between users and notes.

class User(UserMixin, db.Model):
    __tablename__ = 'users'
    id = db.Column(db.Integer, primary_key=True)
    email = db.Column(db.String(254), unique=True, index=True)
    password_hash = db.Column(db.String(256))
    confirmed = db.Column(db.Boolean, default=False)
    avatar_hash = db.Column(db.String(32))
    created_date = db.Column(db.DateTime(), default=datetime.utcnow)
    updated_date = db.Column(db.DateTime(), default=datetime.utcnow)

<span class="nx">notes</span> <span class="o">=</span> <span class="nx">db</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="nx">relationship</span><span class="p">(</span>
    <span class="s1">'Note'</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="nx">backref</span><span class="o">=</span><span class="s1">'author'</span><span class="p">,</span>
    <span class="nx">lazy</span><span class="o">=</span><span class="s1">'dynamic'</span><span class="p">,</span> <span class="nx">cascade</span><span class="o">=</span><span class="s2">"all, delete-orphan"</span><span class="p">)</span>

Even though we define the cascade behavior using SQLAlchemy. When we generate the migration with alembic we get something like this:
sa.ForeignKeyConstraint(['author_id'], ['users.id'], ),
Notice how we are missing the ondelete action. What we actually want is something like this:
sa.ForeignKeyConstraint(['author_id'], ['users.id'], ondelete='CASCADE')
Running the default migration will not create the proper relationship in your database and in our case we are not able to delete a user until we have deleted all of the related records as well. There are two ways to fix this. If you catch this before running your migration addingondelete='CASCADE' will create the proper relationship. If you are like me, and do not catch this, then you will need to run a second migration to remove and recreate these keys. The migration code to do this is shown below:
from alembic import op
import sqlalchemy as sa

def upgrade():
with op.batch_alter_table(“notes”) as batch_op:
batch_op.drop_constraint(
“notes_author_id_fkey”, type_=“foreignkey”)
op.create_foreign_key(
“notes_author_id_fkey”, “notes”, “users”,
[“author_id”], [“id”], ondelete=“CASCADE”)

Now you have the proper foreign key constraints and the CASCADE action exists in the DB.

Thank you for reading! Share your thoughts with me on bluesky, mastodon, or via email.

Check out some more stuff to read down below.

Most popular posts this month

Recent Favorite Blog Posts

This is a collection of the last 8 posts that I bookmarked.

Articles from blogs I follow around the net

The Swiss Cheese model, pt. 3

After two more serious posts in this series, I wanted to stop somewhere a bit more lighthearted and inconsequential. “Here’a a fun thing you can try,” begins this 13-minute video from Retro Game Mechanics Explained: The premise of the parlor trick the vide...

via Unsung August 31, 2026

My Experience Has Nuance, Yours Is a Data Point

Eric Bailey has a fun little post about how we need more than a few icons to express the nuance of our shared human experience. For example, he suggests Netflix provide some feedback buttons to indicate the kinds of experiences we all share consuming and r...

via Jim Nielsen’s Blog August 31, 2026

Issue 109 – Reg Crypto

The SEC’s “Reg Crypto” aims to carve out exemptions, the CFTC wields emergency powers to shield prediction markets from state regulators, and a Trump family crypto firm gets a bank charter

via Citation Needed August 31, 2026

Generated by openring