That UI Bug with Missing Data is a Security Issue
This is (sometimes) a development blog, so I am going to write about some failed development of mine since writing about success is much less interesting. You know that UI bug that someone added to your GitHub Issues where there is some missing data? You know the one, it only happens in production, all of your tests pass, and you marked it as a low priority. Yeah, that one. It’s probably a security bug and you should look into it right away. At least, that is the lesson I taught myself yet again when I began to research this bug.
before
<a id="shared_note.id)" href=""{{">
{{current_user.notes.filter_by(id=shared_note.id).first().title}}
</a>
after
<a href="{{ url_for('main.note', id=shared_note.note_id) }}">
{{current_user.notes.filter_by(id=shared_note.note_id).first().title}}
</a>
The difference is very subtle, but the key issue here is shared_note.id vs shared_note.note_id; I released a feature a few weeks ago that showed you all of the notes that you have shared. Locally everything worked fine, but I noticed later on, once it was in production, that the note title was not showing up. This is, of course, due to the fact that rather than showing the title of the note with the ID shared_note.note_id (the foreign key linking to the note) I was showing the title for the note with the primary key of shared_note.id. The reason why this is a security issue is because this allows someone to share a bunch of notes and start seeing the titles for notes that they do not own. The reason why this worked locally is because I am only testing with a single user, with a single notebook, with a single note, and with a single shared note. This means that in this specific case all of the Primary Keys and Foreign Keys are usually “1” so everything just happens to work.
Key Takeaways
- Always test with multiple users, make your local environment as similar to production as possible
- Consider using UUID instead of Auto Incrementing Integers, this would have been immediately caught if that was the case.
- “Partial Missing Data” == Security Bug (most of the time)
Thank you for reading! Share your thoughts with me on bluesky, mastodon, or via email.
Check out some more stuff to read down below.
Most popular posts this month
- Great Lakes, Illinois
- My Custom Miniflux CSS Theme
- Are we inside a Sarlacc?
- Setting up ANTLR4 on Windows
- Terminal RSS Reader With Nom
Recent Favorite Blog Posts
This is a collection of the last 8 posts that I bookmarked.
- A Year Of Vibes from Armin Ronacher's Thoughts and Writings
- Pluralistic: A perfect distillation of the social uselessness of finance (18 Dec 2025) from Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
- Moving from WordPress to Substack from charity.wtf
- Grow, Like a Tree Not a Cancer from Jim Nielsen’s Blog
- Pluralistic: All the books I reviewed in 2025 (02 Dec 2025) from Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
- DEP-18: A proposal for Git-based collaboration in Debian from Optimized by Otto
- [RIDGELINE] No Phones in The Ten-don Shop from Craig Mod — Writer + Photographer
- Open design: the opportunity design students didn’t know they were missing from Ubuntu blog
Articles from blogs I follow around the net
2025 was for AI what 2010 was for cloud (xpost)
The satellite, experimental technology has become the mainstream, foundational tech. (At least in developer tools.) (xposted from new home) I was at my very first job, Linden Lab, when EC2 and S3 came out in 2006. We were running Second Life out of three …
via charity.wtf December 22, 20252025 was for AI what 2010 was for cloud
The satellite, experimental technology has become the mainstream, foundational tech. (At least in developer tools.)
via charity.wtf December 22, 2025What New Developers Need to Know About Working with AI
It’s been a few years since I wrote Letters to a New Developer, about what I wish I’d known when I was starting out. The industry has changed with the […]
via Dan Moore! December 22, 2025Generated by openring