That UI Bug with Missing Data is a Security Issue
This is (sometimes) a development blog, so I am going to write about some failed development of mine since writing about success is much less interesting. You know that UI bug that someone added to your GitHub Issues where there is some missing data? You know the one, it only happens in production, all of your tests pass, and you marked it as a low priority. Yeah, that one. It’s probably a security bug and you should look into it right away. At least, that is the lesson I taught myself yet again when I began to research this bug.
before
<a id="shared_note.id)" href=""{{">
{{current_user.notes.filter_by(id=shared_note.id).first().title}}
</a>
after
<a href="{{ url_for('main.note', id=shared_note.note_id) }}">
{{current_user.notes.filter_by(id=shared_note.note_id).first().title}}
</a>
The difference is very subtle, but the key issue here is shared_note.id
vs shared_note.note_id
; I released a feature a few weeks ago that showed you all of the notes that you have shared. Locally everything worked fine, but I noticed later on, once it was in production, that the note title was not showing up. This is, of course, due to the fact that rather than showing the title of the note with the ID shared_note.note_id (the foreign key linking to the note) I was showing the title for the note with the primary key of shared_note.id. The reason why this is a security issue is because this allows someone to share a bunch of notes and start seeing the titles for notes that they do not own. The reason why this worked locally is because I am only testing with a single user, with a single notebook, with a single note, and with a single shared note. This means that in this specific case all of the Primary Keys and Foreign Keys are usually “1” so everything just happens to work.
Key Takeaways
- Always test with multiple users, make your local environment as similar to production as possible
- Consider using UUID instead of Auto Incrementing Integers, this would have been immediately caught if that was the case.
- “Partial Missing Data” == Security Bug (most of the time)
Thank you for reading! Share your thoughts with me on bluesky, mastodon, or via email.
Check out some more stuff to read down below.
Most popular posts this month
- 2024
- Reinstalling Windows at 1am
- SQLite DB Migrations with PRAGMA user_version
- My Custom Miniflux CSS Theme
- How to Disable Wayland in Debian Testing
Recent Favorite Blog Posts
This is a collection of the last 8 posts that I bookmarked.
- Give Your Spouse the Gift of a Couple's Email Domain from mtlynch.io
- Have smart glasses finally hit an inflection point? from The Torment Nexus
- The McPhee method from the jsomers.net blog
- Pluralistic: LLMs are slot-machines (16 Aug 2025) from Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
- Pluralistic: Bluesky creates the world's weirdest, hardest-to-understand binding arbitration clause (15 Aug 2025) from Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
- Just a Little More Context Bro, I Promise, and It’ll Fix Everything from Jim Nielsen’s Blog
- The Futzing Fraction from Deciphering Glyph
- Sit On Your Ass Web Development from Jim Nielsen’s Blog
Articles from blogs I follow around the net
Issue 91 – GDP on the blockchain
The regulator set to take on primary crypto oversight is down to a single Commissioner, and new pro-crypto PACs focus on installing more Republicans in the midterms
via Citation Needed August 27, 2025V&A East Storehouse and Operation Mincemeat in London
We were back in London for a few days and yesterday had a day of culture. First up: the brand new V&A East Storehouse museum in the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park near Stratford, which opened on May 31st this year. This is a delightful new format for a mu…
via Simon Willison's Weblog: Entries August 27, 2025Generated by openring